While it was not the next
Friday The 13th movie made (
that was Jason X, which we will get to later), in my mind 2003's
Freddy vs Jason is the next entry chronologically as it ties to final scene of
Jason Goes To Hell.
Taking place four years after the dream demon Freddy Krueger (Robert Englund) last plagued the residents of Elm Street, the older generation of Springwood have concocted a conspiracy of silence, to erase Freddy from the local mythology.
By forgetting him, they are depriving him of the fear that the feeds him, and so he remains trapped in Hell.
However, Freddy has a plan to escape: remind the residents of Springwood of his existence by releasing Jason Voorhees (Ken Kirzinger) from Hell - and pointing him at Elm Street.
The idea being that Jason will stir memories - and fears - of Freddy, eventually giving him enough power to escape Hell himself.
Not only is this is a canny plot device, but
Freddy vs Jason doesn't hang around - with Jason butchering his first Elm Street victim within minutes of the story getting on.
For a 16-year-old film, the visual effects are particularly striking in places, such as in the first few "nightmare" sequences, nice touches like the disappearing bloody footprints and the turning heads on the "Missing" posters, and then, later, the imagery of the burning Jason striding through the cornfields.
What makes Damian Shannon and Mark Swift's screenplay really sing though isn't just the brilliant set-up, but also the way it wove in the conflict between the two supernatural antagonists: having released Jason onto his "patch" Freddy gets pissed when he starts losing potential victims to the hockey mask-wearing zombie.
Given Jason's habit - in several of the earlier
Friday The 13th films - of jumping in and out of Crystal Lake, I don't really buy the "fear of water" he's been given here (
as a heavy-handed polar opposite to Freddy's fear of fire) and the script also plays a bit fast and loose with the specifics of Jason's origin story.
However, I can excuse that as we witness it through the lens of Jason's own dreamscape - nightmare? - and, of course, dreams and, recollections in them, are rarely 100 per cent accurate.
But, even with its narrative flaws,
Freddy vs. Jason is a slick, pulpy, clash of two horror icons, that's probably smarter than the casual viewer might even realise.
While Freddy is, obviously, the more vocal of the pair, the film perfectly balances spotlight time for both the villains, so you can't say this is Jason appearing in a Freddy film or vice versa.
As well as interesting dives into what passes for Jason's psyche, there are also some nice touches in the movie that a diehard Fredhead like myself can really appreciate.
We get to see Freddy's world operating on an almost
Looney Toons-level of dream logic, that makes a significant change in tone to match the change of setting, and then it's really brought home just how weedy Freddy actually is when pulled through into the "real world".
It's his evil cunning, as much as anything, that allows him to go toe-to-toe with Jason on the dock at Crystal Lake.
With Jason well and truly back at the end of the film - but Freddy certainly not out of contention -
Freddy vs Jason actually does a nice job of restoring the status quo to both franchises.
Just a shame that
Friday The 13th only managed one more (
before its failed reboot) and
A Nightmare on Elm Street went straight for the failed reboot option.
As the last few entries in the
Friday the 13th series showed (
and I'm including Jason X here, but excluding Jason Takes Manhattan), if you're willing to take risks talented writers can always breathe new life into a long-running franchise... if given the chance.