In a magical world where dragons are the suppressed symbol of a better age, why does no one spot that the name of a simple farm boy (Ed Speleers) is simply "dragon" with the first letter bumped to the next in the alphabet:
Eragon?
It also manages to sound as close as possible to Aragorn (
the most famous of fantasy heroes?) without risking a lawsuit from the Tolkien Estate.
Although I'd imagine it would be the
Lucasfilm lawyers knocking at the door first as the script is pretty much a reskinning of
Star Wars with Eragon as Luke, Brom (Jeremy Irons) as Obi-Wan, Uncle Garrow (Alun Armstrong) as Uncle Owen, the evil king Galbatorix (John Malkovich) and his wizard Durza (Robert Carlyse) as The Emperor and Vader, the captured Princess Arya (Sienna Guillory) as Leia, the rebel Varden as... well, The Rebels;
I think you get the picture by now!Even the supernatural power of The Force is personified by Eragon's CGI dragon Saphira (
voiced by Rachel Weisz) - and Eragon's innate dragon-magic (
plot-wise, Saphira also doubles as the Millennium Falcon and the plans to the Death Star!)
There are places where some of the less abysmal dialogue and scenes feel like they are lifted directly from George Lucas'
Original Trilogy, with just a few minor tweaks - from magic that "flows through" and "unites" a dragon and its rider to Durza killing an unsuccessful 'boss' minion then promoting one its colleagues into its place.
As there is no Han Solo analogue in the movie at this stage (
don't worry, Garrett Hedlund's roguish Murtagh - who has a very Star Wars-y secret of his own - reveals himself a short time later), Durza tortures the Princess to send a 'false' telepathic 'distress call' to trick Eragon into facing him - think Vader on Cloud City in
The Empire Strikes Back - even though Brom (
now in Yoda mode) tells the young farm boy he's not yet ready to face Durza.
And when Eragon busts the Princess out of the Death Star holding cell... er... Durza's castle, naturally Obi-Brom has to give his life so that the others can escape (
although his death scene is more drawn out).
Not only is
Eragon unoriginal, it is badly written (
for instance, about half an hour in, Jeremy Irons makes an expositional speech that repeats the useful infodump delivered in the movie's stilted voice-over introduction) and the acting ranges from scene-chewingly hammy (
by the established names in the cast - collecting their pay cheques and getting out as soon as possible) to simply bad (
by everyone else, particularly from young Eragon himself).
Rather oddly, very early on, talk is made of there being elves and dwarves in the kingdom - but they never actually appear on screen, so you have to wonder why they were brought up in the first place?
On a positive note, the film looks great - the Eastern European scenery is spectacular, the costumes and weaponry are well crafted and the critters are suitably
Dungeons & Dragons-y - but such little effort has been made to conceal the source material being plagiarised that the film's best use is as a "spot the
Star Wars analogy" drinking game.
And like so many fantasy modern films that have tried to emulate the success of
Star Wars, but failed to learn how to do it properly,
Eragon finishes mid-story, expecting a sequel to be guaranteed.
Of course none was forthcoming, leaving many plot threads dangling and certain characters totally superfluous!